Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult. METHODS: We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68 min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of elobixibat plus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate and split-dose 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before outpatient colonoscopy: a study protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled E-PLUS trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium picosulfate (SP)/magnesium citrate (MC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid are recommended by Western guidelines as laxative solutions for bowel preparation. Clinically, SP/MC has a slower post-dose defaecation response than PEG and is perceived as less cleansing; therefore, it is not currently used for major bowel cancer screening preparation. The standard formulation for bowel preparation is PEG; however, a large dose is required, and it has a distinctive flavour that is considered unpleasant. SP/MC requires a small dose and ensures fluid intake because it is administered in another beverage. Therefore, clinical trials have shown that SP/MC is superior to PEG in terms of acceptability. We aim to compare the novel bowel cleansing method (test group) comprising SP/MC with elobixibat hydrate and the standard bowel cleansing method comprising PEG plus ascorbic acid (standard group) for patients preparing for outpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: This phase III, multicentre, single-blind, noninferiority, randomised, controlled, trial has not yet been completed. Patients aged 40-69 years will be included as participants. Patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, or severe organ dysfunction will be excluded. The target number of research participants is 540 (standard group, 270 cases; test group, 270 cases). The primary endpoint is the degree of bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥ 6). The secondary endpoints are patient acceptability, adverse events, polyp/adenoma detection rate, number of polyps/adenomas detected, degree of bowel cleansing according to the BBPS (BBPS score ≥ 8), degree of bowel cleansing according to the Aronchik scale, and bowel cleansing time. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to develop a "patient-first" colon cleansing regimen without the risk of inadequate bowel preparation by using both elobixibat hydrate and SP/MC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; no. s041210067; 9 September 2021; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ), protocol version 1.5 (May 1, 2023).

Investigation of vertical margin involvement in endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The resection of vertical margin-negative submucosally invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) relies on the pathological risk assessment of lymph node metastasis. However, no large-scale study has clarified the endoscopic resection (ER) outcome for submucosally invasive CRC, focusing on the vertical margin status. This retrospective study aimed to examine vertical margin involvement in ER for submucosally invasive CRC and explore the treatment consequences associated with vertical margin status. METHODS: We analyzed 395 submucosally invasive CRC cases in 389 patients who underwent ER at our hospital between 2008 and 2020. The presence of residual tumors and simultaneous lymph node metastasis in patients who underwent additional surgery was assessed and compared between the vertical incomplete ER and the vertical margin-negative groups. RESULTS: Among the patients, 270 were men, with a median age of 69 years. The vertical incomplete ER rate was 21.5%, with positive vertical margins and unclear vertical margins identified in 12.2% and 9.3% of the cases, respectively. Among 154 patients who underwent additional surgery after ER, the vertical incomplete ER group had a significantly higher residual tumor rate than the vertical margin-negative group (P = 0.001). The vertical incomplete ER group had a significantly higher lymph node metastasis rate than the vertical margin-negative group (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: This study clarified the substantial risk of vertical incomplete ER in submucosally invasive CRC and revealed the high risk of residual tumor and lymph node metastasis in vertical incomplete ER for submucosal CRC.

Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device's two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection enabled safe resection of colorectal lesions measuring 10-15 mm in an ex vivo porcine model. ER with bipolar snare is expected to have good treatment outcomes in 10-15 mm colorectal lesions, with high safety even without submucosal injection. However, no clinical reports have compared treatment outcomes with and without submucosal injection. AIM: To compare the treatment outcomes of bipolar polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) to those with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study, we enrolled 10-15 mm nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (565 Lesions in 463 patients) diagnosed as type 2A based on the Japan Narrow-band Imaging Expert Team classification, resected by either HSP or EMR between January 2018 and June 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Lesions were divided into HSP and EMR groups, and propensity score matching was performed. In the matched cohort, en bloc and R0 resection rates and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 565 lesions in 463 patients, 117 lesions each in the HSP and EMR groups were selected after propensity score matching. In the original cohort, there was a significant difference in antithrombotic drug use (P < 0.05), lesion size (P < 0.01), location (P < 0.01), and macroscopic type (P < 0.05) between the HSP and EMR groups. In the matched cohort, the en bloc resection rates were comparable between both groups [93.2% (109/117) vs 92.3% (108/117), P = 0.81], and there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate [77.8% (91/117) vs 80.3% (94/117), P = 0.64]. The incidence of delayed bleeding was similar in both groups [1.7% (2/117)]. Perforation occurred in the EMR group [0.9% (1/117)] but not in the HSP group. CONCLUSION: Using bipolar snare, ER of nonpedunculated 10-15 mm colorectal lesions may be performed safely and effectively, even without submucosal injection.

Efficacy and safety of repeated endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure for benign esophageal stricture.

Background and study aims: Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is indicated for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and has shown favorable short-term outcomes. However, re-stricture after RIC may occur in the long term, and RIC is performed repeatedly in such cases, but the efficacy and safety of repeated RIC are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the repeated RIC for refractory benign esophageal strictures after surgical and non-surgical treatment. Patients and methods: Between April 2008 and September 2019, we enrolled patients who were treated with the first RIC for benign esophageal strictures. The RIC was indicated for the refractory stricture and repeatedly performed for re-refractory esophageal stricture after RIC. We retrospectively evaluated the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate, and adverse events (AEs) in the first RIC and repeated RICs. Results: Forty-six patients (39 men, 7 women; median age, 71 years, range 49-85) were included. RIC was performed once in 24 patients (non-repeated RIC group) and two or more times in 22 patients (repeated RIC group). In all patients, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first RIC were 42.3 %. In the repeated RIC group, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first and repeated RICs were 18.2 % vs 18.2 %, respectively. No AEs were noted. Conclusions: Repeated RIC could be effective in the short-term and safe even for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture after the first RIC. However, it cannot be considered curative treatment for refractory stricture because of poor long-term results.

An exosome-based liquid biopsy signature for pre-operative identification of lymph node metastasis in patients with pathological high-risk T1 colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, more than 70% of patients with invasive submucosal colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) undergo a radical operation with lymph node dissection, even though only ~ 10% have lymph node metastasis (LNM). Hence, there is imperative to develop biomarkers that can help robustly identify LNM-positive patients to prevent such overtreatments. Given the emerging interest in exosomal cargo as a source for biomarker development in cancer, we examined the potential of exosomal miRNAs as LNM prediction biomarkers in T1 CRC. METHODS: We analyzed 200 patients with high-risk T1 CRC from two independent cohorts, including a training (n = 58) and a validation cohort (n = 142). Cell-free and exosomal RNAs from pre-operative serum were extracted, followed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions for a panel of miRNAs. RESULTS: A panel of four miRNAs (miR-181b, miR-193b, miR-195, and miR-411) exhibited robust ability for detecting LNM in the exosomal vs. cell-free component. We subsequently established a cell-free and exosomal combination signature, successfully validated in two independent clinical cohorts (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). Finally, we developed a risk-stratification model by including key pathological features, which reduced the false positive rates for LNM by 76% without missing any true LNM-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel exosomal miRNA-based liquid biopsy signature robustly identifies T1 CRC patients at risk of LNM in a preoperative setting. This could be clinically transformative in reducing the significant overtreatment burden of this malignancy.

Prospective study on the risk of transmission due to droplets and aerosols during an endoscopic procedure and the usefulness of extraoral suction devices.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopy poses a high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection for medical personnel due to the dispersal of aerosols from the patient. We investigated the location and size of droplets generated during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the contamination of the surrounding area before and after the procedures, and the effectiveness of using an extraoral suction device (Free arm arteo; TOKYO GIKEN, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). METHODS: Patients who consented to the study and underwent EGD or ESD between December 8, 2020, and April 15, 2021, at the National Cancer Center East Hospital were included. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hygiene monitoring tests and a particle counter were used for measurements. RESULTS: Assessments were performed on 22 EGD and 15 ESD cases. ATP hygiene monitoring tests showed significant elevations at three sites near the patient, and two sites 1.5 m away, for EGD, and at four sites near the patient and 1.5 m away for ESD. In both ESD and EGD, extraoral suction devices reduced the extent of the contamination. Particles <5 µm in size were generated during endoscopic procedures and dispersed from both the forceps hole and the patient's mouth. The extraoral suction device did not reduce the number of particles generated. CONCLUSIONS: During endoscopic procedures, cleaning the surrounding environment is important in addition to standard precautions the endoscopist and caregivers take. The use of extraoral suction devices can also potentially reduce contamination of the surrounding environment.

A DNA Methylation-based Epigenetic Signature for the Identification of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to unravel the lymph node metastasis (LNM)-related methylated DNA (mDNA) landscape and develop a mDNA signature to identify LNM in patients with T1 colorectal cancers (T1 CRC). BACKGROUND: Considering the invasiveness of T1 CRC, current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection in patients with LNM-negative, and radical surgical resection only for high-risk LNM-positive patients. Unfortunately, the clinicopathological criteria for LNM risk stratification are imperfect, resulting in frequent misdiagnosis leading to unnecessary radical surgeries and postsurgical complications. METHODS: We conducted genome-wide methylation profiling of 39 T1 CRC specimens to identify differentially methylated CpGs between LNM-positive and LNM-negative, and performed quantitative pyrosequencing analysis in 235 specimens from 3 independent patient cohorts, including 195 resected tissues (training cohort: n=128, validation cohort: n=67) and 40 pretreatment biopsies. RESULTS: Using logistic regression analysis, we developed a 9-CpG signature to distinguish LNM-positive versus LNM-negative surgical specimens in the training cohort [area under the curve (AUC)=0.831, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.755-0.892; P <0.0001], which was subsequently validated in additional surgical specimens (AUC=0.825; 95% CI=0.696-0.955; P =0.003) and pretreatment biopsies (AUC=0.836; 95% CI=0.640-1.000, P =0.0036). This diagnostic power was further improved by combining the signature with conventional clinicopathological features. CONCLUSIONS: We established a novel epigenetic signature that can robustly identify LNM in surgical specimens and even pretreatment biopsies from patients with T1 CRC. Our signature has strong translational potential to improve the selection of high-risk patients who require radical surgery while sparing others from its complications and expense.

Endoscopic management of familial adenomatous polyposis targeting colorectal lesions greater than 5 mm in size: a single-center retrospective study.

Preserving the colon while preventing colorectal cancer is challenging in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although prophylactic colectomy is the current standard of care, some patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may wish to postpone colectomy as long as polyposis can be managed by endoscopic resection. This study examined our endoscopic management and prognostic results for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who refused to undergo colectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis treated at our hospital between January 1995 and December 2020. All patients opted to postpone prophylactic colectomy although they had significant polyp burdens and underwent endoscopic management, in which colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were thoroughly resected during baseline colonoscopies and subsequently, newly arising colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were periodically resected during surveillance colonoscopies. Patients (median age, 33 years) were followed up for a median of 5.2 years. The median number of colonoscopies and resected lesions per patient was 2 and 14 at baseline as well as, 9 and 32 during surveillance, respectively. The interval between colonoscopies was 1.0 and 7.0 months for baseline and surveillance, respectively. The colons of all 12 patients were preserved, and no invasive colorectal cancer developed. In 10 patients, 35 cases of high-grade dysplasia were observed and managed by endoscopic resection. Repeated endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm with appropriate surveillance may be an alternative form of endoscopic management for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis wishing to postpone colectomy.

Detection of colorectal adenomas with texture and color enhancement imaging: Multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), which allows the acquisition of brighter images with enhanced color and surface structure in colorectal polyp detection compared to white light imaging. METHODS: Patients who underwent colonoscopy with repeated ascending colon observation using TXI and white light imaging between August 2020 and January 2021 were identified in three institutions. The outcomes included the mean number of adenomas detected per procedure (MAP), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and ascending colonic adenoma miss rate (Ac-AMR). Logistic regression was used to determine the effects of the variables on the outcomes. RESULTS: We included 1043 lesions from 470 patients in the analysis. The MAP, ADR, flat polyp detection rate, and Ac-AMR in TXI and white light imaging were 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.3-1.6%) vs. 1.0% (0.9-1.1%), 58.2% (51.7-64.6%) vs. 46.8% (40.2-53.4%), 66.2% (59.8-72.2%) vs. 49.8% (43.2-56.4%), and 17.9% (12.1-25.2%) vs. 28.2% (20.0-37.6%), respectively. TXI, age, withdrawal time, and endoscopy type were identified as significant factors affecting the MAP and the ADR using multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that TXI improve the detection of colorectal neoplastic lesions. However, prospective randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting treatment efficacy of salvage endoscopic therapy for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Salvage endoscopic therapy, including endoscopic resection (ER) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Resection with pathologically vertical margin-negative (VM0) for ER and local complete response (L-CR) for PDT are important surrogate prognostic markers for each therapy's efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic therapy in local failure after CRT for ESCC. METHODS: We included patients who underwent EUS followed by ER or PDT for local failure after CRT or radiotherapy for ESCC from 2006 to 2020. We evaluated EUS findings associated with VM0 resection for ER and L-CR for PDT, which included the status of the outermost part of the submucosal layer, tumor thickness, and tumor invasion length into the muscularis propria (MP) layer. RESULTS: Thirty and 47 patients were enrolled into the ER and PDT groups, respectively. The VM0 resection rate in the ER group was 87% (26/30). The EUS findings associated with VM0 resection were tumor thickness < 2.3 mm (p = 0.01) and preserved hyperechoic line of the outermost part of the submucosa layer (p < 0.01). The L-CR rate in the PDT group was 69% (32/47). The EUS findings associated with L-CR were tumor thickness < 5.0 mm (p < 0.01) and tumor invasion length into the MP layer < 1.6 mm (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EUS can be useful in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic treatment for local failure after CRT for ESCC.

Development of new gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model: A reproducibility evaluation study.

Background and study aims Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a highly technical procedure mainly due to the distinctive shape of the stomach and diverse locations of lesions. We developed a new gastric ESD training model (G-Master) that could accurately recreate the location of the stomach and assessed the reproducibility of located lesions in the model. Methods The model comprises a simulated mucous membrane sheet made of konjac flour and a setting frame, which can simulate 11 locations of the stomach. We assessed the reproducibility of each location in the model by assessing the procedure speed and using a questionnaire that was distributed among experts. In the questionnaire, each location was scored on a six-point scale for similarity of locations. Results The mean score for all locations was high with > 4 points. Regarding locations, lower anterior and posterior walls had medium scores with 3 to 4 points. The procedure speed was slower in the greater curvature of the upper and middle gastric portions, where ESD is considered more difficult than the overall procedure speed. Conclusions The new gastric ESD training model appears to be highly reproducible for each gastric location and its application for training in assuming actual gastric ESD locations.

Salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection.

OBJECTIVES: Salvage endoscopic resection is recommended when the local recurrence at primary site after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is localized and superficial. This retrospective study aimed to comparatively analyse the short-term outcomes and local control of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection versus salvage endoscopic mucosal resection for local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent initial salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 1998 and August 2019 patients were assigned to either the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (40 patients; 40 lesions) or salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (56 patients; 56 lesions) group. We evaluated the en bloc and R0 resection rates, severe adverse events and local failure rate after salvage endoscopic resection. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection. RESULTS: The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group than in the salvage endoscopic mucosal resection group (95% versus 63%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in R0 resection rate between the two groups (73% versus 52%, P = 0.057). One patient (3%) in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group had perforation. The 3-year cumulative local failure rate of salvage endoscopic mucosal resection was significantly higher than that of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (27% versus 5%, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (hazard ratio: 2.7, P = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is the effective treatment for local recurrence based on the short-term outcomes and local efficacy.

The usefulness of a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists in a porcine model (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an optimal treatment for colorectal tumors; however, it is technically difficult, especially for non-experts. Therefore, a device that helps non-experts perform colorectal ESD would be beneficial. A double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform (DEIP) was recently developed to assist colorectal ESD through endoscope stabilization and traction. This study assessed the usefulness of colorectal ESD using the DEIP (DEIP-ESD) by endoscopists, including non-experts, in a living porcine model. METHODS: Two pigs were used to perform eight DEIP-ESD and eight conventional cap-assisted ESD (C-ESD) procedures. Three experts and five non-experts each resected one lesion using DEIP-ESD and one using C-ESD. We evaluated the treatment outcomes and performed stratified analyses between the experts and non-experts. RESULTS: Dissection speed was significantly faster in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD (13.3 mm2/min vs 28.5 mm2/min, P = 0.002). However, the total procedure time did not differ significantly between DEIP-ESD and C-ESD. In the stratified analyses, the dissection speed of non-experts was significantly faster in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD (10.9 mm2/min vs 25.1 mm2/min, P = 0.016), while that of experts increased in DEIP-ESD but to a lesser extent (19.1 mm2/min vs 28.8 mm2/min, P = 0.1). The total procedure time did not differ between DEIP-ESD and C-ESD for both experts and non-experts. The self-completion rate of non-experts also increased in DEIP-ESD. Moreover, the number of muscularis propria injuries induced by non-experts was fewer in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD. CONCLUSIONS: DEIP could facilitate colorectal ESD by improving dissection efficiency without increasing adverse events, especially when performed by non-experts.

Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy.

The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) is a new endoscope that helps estimate the size of neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract. We compared the accuracy of polyp size estimation by VSE with that of visual estimation. A dual center prospective study was conducted in two Japanese academic endoscopy units. Ten endoscopists (five trainees and five experts) estimated the size of 20 simulated polyps in four colon phantoms during colonoscopy by two methods: conventional visual estimation and estimation by VSE. The primary endpoint was the relative accuracy in relation to true polyp size according to visual estimation and VSE estimation during colonoscopy. The secondary endpoint was the required time (the time needed to measure in each procedure). The mean values of the primary end-point were 62.5% for visual estimation and 84.0% for VSE estimation; hence the result differed significantly (95% confidence interval 18.3-24.7; P < 0.001). The mean of required times was significantly longer for estimation by VSE (6.4 min) than that by visual estimation (2.9 min; P < 0.001). The accuracy of colorectal polyp size estimation was superior with VSE than with visual estimation during colonoscopy. In the future, VSE should be evaluated in actual clinical settings, including the time required for size estimation.

Recurrent metastasis risk factors in esophageal cancer after salvage endoscopic resection for local failure following chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Although salvage endoscopic resection is an optimal treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent metastasis (lymph node and/or distant metastasis) after salvage endoscopic resection may occur with a certain degree of unavoidable frequency and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the risk factors for recurrent metastasis are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent salvage endoscopic resection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy were analyzed in this single-center, retrospective study. We evaluated the cumulative incidence rates of recurrent metastases, overall survival, and the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. RESULTS: We analyzed 132 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of recurrent metastases after salvage endoscopic resection was 25.7%. The 5-year overall survival rates in all patients and in patients with recurrent metastasis were 66.8% and 22.5%, respectively. Local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.34; P = 0.012) and the presence of lymphatic invasion in salvage endoscopic resection specimen (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.20; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for recurrent metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and presence of lymphatic invasion have a high risk for recurrent metastasis. Thus, appropriate surveillance for these patients should be considered.

Detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.

Owing to its high mortality rate, the prevention of colorectal cancer is of particular importance. The resection of colorectal polyps is reported to drastically reduce colorectal cancer mortality, and examination by endoscopists who had a high adenoma detection rate was found to lower the risk of colorectal cancer, highlighting the importance of identifying lesions. Various devices, imaging techniques, and diagnostic tools aimed at reducing the rate of missed lesions have therefore been developed to improve detection. The distal attachments and devices for improving the endoscopic view angle are intended to help avoid missing blind spots such as folds and flexures in the colon, whereas the imaging techniques represented by image-enhanced endoscopy contribute to improving lesion visibility. Recent advances in artificial intelligence-supported detection systems are expected to supplement an endoscopist's eye through the instant diagnosis of the lesions displayed on the monitor. In this review, we provide an outline of each tool and assess its impact on the reduction in the incidence of missed colorectal polyps by summarizing previous clinical research and meta-analyses. Although useful, the many devices, image-enhanced endoscopy, and artificial intelligence tools exhibited various limitations. Integrating these tools can improve their shortcomings. Combining artificial intelligence-based diagnoses with wide-angle image-enhanced endoscopy may be particularly useful. Thus, we hope that such tools will be available in the near future.

Factors of technical difficulty in conventional and traction-assisted esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: The traction assisted (TA) method has reduced the technical difficulty associated with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear which factors associated with difficulty have been improved by the TA-ESD method. We aimed to evaluate and compare difficulty factors between conventional and TA-ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients treated by ESD from Apr 2010 to Jun 2014 for the conventional ESD cohort and from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 for the TA-ESD cohort. Difficult cases were defined as; (1) ≥ 120 min ESD procedure time, (2) intraoperative perforation, or (3) piecemeal resection. We explored and compared the factors associated with technical difficulty in each cohort. RESULTS: The conventional and TA-ESD cohorts included 285 (299 lesions) and 387 (421 lesions) patients, respectively. For difficult cases, the conventional and TA-ESD cohorts had 91 (30%) and 71 (17%) lesions, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that ≥ 30 mm lesion length (odds ratio (OR) 6.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-13.50), lower esophagus (OR 2.37, 95% Cl 1.34-4.21), > 1/2 circumference (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.99), and left wall (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.20) in the conventional ESD cohort, and ≥ 30 mm lesion length (21.30, 95% CI 4.75-95.30), lower esophagus (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.52-6.13), and > 1/2 circumference (OR 6.40, 95% CI 3.06-13.40) in the TA-ESD cohort, were independently associated with technical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: TA-ESD can reduce the difficulty in cases including lesions in the left wall; however, cases in the lower esophagus and large lesions were still difficult to simplify.

The safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a flexible three-dimensional endoscope for early gastric cancer and superficial esophageal cancer: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is performed as one of standard treatments for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and superficial esophageal squamous cancer (SESCC). A prototype of a flexible endoscope with a 3-D system has been recently developed. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of ESD using a 3-D flexible endoscope (3-D ESD) for EGC and SESCC. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent planned 3-D ESD. The clinical outcomes, including the incidence of adverse events and treatment results, were analyzed. Visibility and manipulation during 3-D ESD were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We also evaluated the effect of the 3-D system on the endoscopist using VAS and the critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF). RESULTS: We analyzed 47 EGC and 20 SESCC cases. There are no bleeding cases that required transfusion and perforation during 3-D ESD in both EGC and SESCC patients. However, the incidence of delayed bleeding and delayed perforation was 1.5% (one case) each. The mean VAS scores for recognizing the submucosal layer during the submucosal dissection, visual perception of blood vessel, and depth perception were 72.7 ± 22.2, 74.7 ± 21.8, and 78.2 ± 19.9, respectively. In contrast, the mean VAS score for manipulation was 25.4 ± 19.7. Among endoscopists, there was no significant difference in the VAS of eyestrain and headache before and after ESD, and there was no significant difference in the CFFF. CONCLUSION: The safety and feasibility of 3-D ESD for EGC and SESCC are acceptable in both patients and endoscopists.